The first agentic OS
for Quantum R&D teams
is here

What took your team weeks now takes hours, as specialized AI agents investigate, build, test, and run quantum experiments end-to-end, visible and verifiable at every step.

How Haiqu AgenticOS works

A team of scientific agents at each stage, built so no step goes unchecked.

Every stage produces something you can inspect, version, and test, so nothing you didn’t approve quietly carries forward.

  1. 01

    Start with what you know

    Start from a research question, papers, data, or an existing idea. Haiqu AgenticOS helps clarify the objective, constraints, success criteria, and the research needed to test it.

    Opening chat: a researcher describes a proton-transfer simulation and attaches an arXiv paper.
  2. 02

    Turn your question into a verifiable research graph

    Haiqu AgenticOS structures the work into a graph where each node is a team of specialized AI agents, showing dependencies, decisions, artifacts, and where the investigation branches or loops back.

    Project graph of connected research modules, from problem formalization and literature review to prototype build.
  3. 03

    Inspect, steer, and verify the work.

    Review artifacts, comment on assumptions, redirect modules, approve critical decisions, and verify results before downstream work continues.

    A draft problem-formalization memo flagged for review, with researcher feedback added inline.
  4. 04

    Ground every module in real knowledge

    Haiqu AgenticOS reads from a deployed knowledge base of quantum theory, algorithms, and industry use cases, alongside the project’s own accepted decisions and artifacts as work proceeds.

    Diagram showing a research module drawing on a deployed knowledge base and the project’s own growing knowledge.
Opening chat: a researcher describes a proton-transfer simulation and attaches an arXiv paper.
Case study · Quantum chemistry

A better research system beats a bigger model.

Haiqu AgenticOS, running on a smaller model, produced a verified result, while even standalone attempts on a larger model still silently changed the experiment.

5 standalone runs

Without Haiqu AgenticOS

FCI proton-transfer profiles from standalone baseline agents: barrier heights scatter widely because each run changed the experiment.
  • 3 of 5 runs ignored explicit instructions
  • Geometry drifted from what was asked
  • 5 runs, 5 different answers
Result Failed
One fixed protocol

With Haiqu AgenticOS

Controlled proton-transfer double well: SQD closely tracks the exact reference under one fixed protocol.
  • Followed instructions exactly
  • Geometry matched the intended path
  • Quantum method (SQD) beats classical methods
SQD barrier 555 meV
FCI reference 574 meV

Plausible output is not enough. The experiment has to stay validated.

Read the case study
A powerful model can still make silent mistakes.

Why general-purpose AI breaks down

Two research lines diverge at an unseen fork: checks pass and the run finishes cleanly, but on a different path from the experiment that was asked for.
01 · Early divergence

A small mistake can change the experiment.

Source: Rahman et al., arXiv:2609.17930

02 · Context loss

Long projects lose the thread.

Source: Wang et al., arXiv:2604.11978

A chain of dependent steps where one mistake is carried into every later step.
03 · Error propagation

One unchecked error becomes many.

Source: Zhan et al., arXiv:2601.22984

Serious research needs more than intelligence at each step. It needs continuity across the whole investigation.

Curious to learn more?

Sam Kearney

Book an intro call

with Sam Kearney, Head of Growth, we’ll confirm your maturity stage, target application area, and success criteria.

Open Calendar

Book a demo

Find out how Haiqu AgenticOS can help accelerate your research.

Start Now